
| Friday, January 9, 2009 |
"I force people to play together and make nice," he says. And while he notes that telling established professionals to change their well-seasoned ways required healthy doses of diplomacy, his efforts were met with surprisingly little resistance. "A lot of people wanted to be involved in a single community," he says, "they just did not know how to break the mold." One of his first moves as provost was to bring together previously incommunicado department heads and charge them with developing a program of integrated study. The result of that collaboration is the forthcoming honors program, a three-year course of study set to begin this fall. The plan calls for a two-year sequence of history classes that establish the program's broader context, while literature, philosophy, and foundation studio art classes cover related material. The third year features a pair of linked colloquia-one in art history and the other a visual science seminar-followed by a study-abroad trip. Cyphers himself teaches a class in the politics of American culture and one on American working class history, a subject central to his book, The National Civic Federation and the Making of a New Liberalism, 1910-1915. He also has a new book in the works, which explores the bizarre social history and quirky characters of a New England town near where he grew up. Cyphers says he wishes he could teach more, but he is also excited by his administrative role in liberalizing art education, an initiative he feels is becoming increasingly important. Picking up the Hampden-Sydney President's Report from a stack of papers on his desk, he opens it to a marked quotation by H-SC provost Earl Fleck on the need for broad-based education in the technology revolution. "This is a mantra of mine as well," he says. "Our state-of-the-art equipment here will allow incoming freshmen to produce things unthinkable ten years ago, but by the time they graduate that technology will be obsolete. What they should get from their experience here, in addition to the fundamentals of making art, is the ability to educate themselves. That may or may not come from sculpting or photography or painting, but it most certainly will come if they are able to think critically, understand context, and defend their position in writing and speech." The linguistic component, Cyphers says, is especially significant. It is also especially deficient. "There's a lack of public discourse about art. Whenever it does get discussed in public it is in a bad way," he says, citing an incident in which then-Mayor Giuliani threatened to suspend funding to a museum unless they removed a controversial exhibit by an SVA alumnus. "There was no discus-sion about the art or what she was trying to communicate. There was a critical response, but it was purely ad hominem." To counter this "chronic need," Cyphers is spearheading the development of an MFA program in Art Criticism. "The goal is to train a cohort of public intellectuals who can speak in plain English to an interested lay population about artistic practices and looking at art," he says. The program would mark their first truly academic degree, but the aim is consistent with Cyphers' broader educational goal, which is to help art gain a stronger foothold within our social discourse and cultural conscience. And while SVA students must first and foremost learn the technical skills of their trade, Cyphers feels that developing conceptual skills is a necessary step in achieving this goal. "I want students to leave here putting as much effort and energy into their intellectual pursuits as their creative pursuits," he says. "I don't know how one could ever separate those two things. The practice of making art and the practice of thinking about it, writing about it, and talking about it have always been seen as two separate processes, as mutually exclusive. I contend that they're mutually reinforcing. But it's a large, unanswered question. I just want to get the artists and academics talking about it." |
