
| Friday, January 9, 2009 |
Just two days later Hickok began what would become the longest tenure of any secretary of education in Pennsylvania. And over the course of that following six years he gained national attention for his efforts in implementing Ridge's reform agenda. He testified before the U.S. Congress about the success of those initiatives. An unknown face in the world of educational politics, Hickok sparked curiosity among the state's rank-and-file policy makers when he assumed the position. But he says his relative inexperience was a boon, despite the headaches of a greater learning curve. "Because I was an academic, I couldn't be pigeonholed politically," he says. "And because I really needed to learn the way things worked, I asked questions that no one had asked for a long time." Likewise, he says the state level perspective has afforded him important insights at the federal level. Of the upward of $480 billion dollars a year spent on education in America, 8% comes from the federal level; it often comes with regulations and directives attached which can conflict with local ideas about the educational process.And while he enjoys the intensity of his current position, he says he misses the actual proximity to education. "I'm much further away from the process now," he notes. "At the state level, where I dealt with budget and policy, " says Hickok, "I could feel the relationship between what I did and what took place in classrooms. Now, because D.C. is removed from that and because most decisions are made at the state level, my primary customers are state actors." In Virginia, one of those actors is Thomas Jackson, whose advocacy of Virginia's Standards of Learning program seems to resonate with the mandate for state accountability testing so central to 'No Child Left Behind'.But despite the ostensible commonalities, Jackson and Hickok have spent the last year on opposite ends of a heated public volley between Virginia officials, who have drafted several proposals requesting specific adjustments and exemptions in regard to 'No Child Left Behind.' The U.S. Department of Education has firmly rejected each one. The education department has also rejected a resolution passed in the General Assembly asking Congress to exempt Virginia altogether because it already established its own successful accountability program.Tensions between state and federal educational policy makers have obviously tightened since the passage of 'No Child Left Behind.' But Hickok, who points out that the levels of clamor and the rates of compliance have grown in equal proportions, says this effect is not necessarily negative. "There's a lot of anxiety out there. This is a complex law. It requires a lot of change. Of course there's lots of complaining," he says. "That's exactly what you should hear from good men and woman who care about the public interest and who are trying to institute change." This is certainly true of Hickok and Jackson, both of whom are driven by their common belief in the value of education. They also share an acute awareness of a changing culture of education in America. "Fifty years ago," Hickok says, "Brown v. Board of Education changed everything. Zoom forward fifty years. We still have achievement gaps, which in this country is unacceptable. My hope is that fifty years from now we'll look back and see 'No Child Left Behind' as the next logical step. If Brown was about access, this is about success. We are talking about educating the next generation of America, and that's a generation which will have tremendous responsibilities. If this is a nation that can put a probe on Mars and can talk about putting a man on Mars, it's certainly a nation that can make sure its children can read. I really feel 'No Child Left Behind' is helping public education better reflect the challenges of the twenty-first century. And I'm excited to be part of that process."
"Two decades ago," Jackson explains, "the teacher taught to the whole group and everyone moved on purely for social promotion. Last year was the first year students [in Virginia] really had to meet meaningful requirements to move on. The process is becoming much more individual and intentional." The agent of that change, he says, is accessible data. "When I was a delegate, we based policy on assumptions and anecdotal evidence. We were completely reactive. Now we have the information to show us how certain programs affect student achievement, and we better know what causes the illness of poor performance. It's an important step towards becoming proactive." "I base my philosophy of education on the belief that every child can learn," Jackson continues. "The issue is resources and time, not capability, which is why access to data is such a monumental thing at the policy level. Public education is better now than ever. And I'm equally confident that the best is yet to come."A leadership profile on Hickok in the Summer 2004 issue of The Business of Government, published by the IBM Center for The Business of Government, states, "Over the past three years, the act ['No Child Left Behind'] has changed the way Americans think about education. While it is early to see dramatic changes in test scores, or troubled schools turned around, there is evidence that scores are improving and schools are moving in the right direction. What is also encouraging to Hickok is the fact that the conversation about education has changed: 'Everywhere-and I read newspapers all the time, the newspapers that cover school board meetings-the conversation is all about performance, accountability, test scores, curriculum, highly qualified teachers. It's the kind of thing that wasn't part of the commentary just a few years ago.' "'No Child Left Behind' has already become a major issue in the 2004 presidential election. We can expect education to be an issue in the Virginia gubernatorial election in 2005. Jackson and Hickok, like many "good men and good citizens" in the electorate, may disagree on the means to improve public education-'No Child Left Behind' or SOLs-but they share a common commitment to the value of learning to the individual and to society, a commitment that both assert is rooted in their Hampden-Sydney education. Eugene W. Hickok, Jr. '72,Deputy Secretary of Education in the Federal Government and one of the chief proponents of the 'No Child Left Behind' act. |

