World
Citizenship Proposal - Draft
For QEP
August 1, 2005
Aim: To provide our students with opportunities
to expand their understanding of different cultures.[k1]
Background:
A significant facet of the mission of
The Hampden-Sydney College Long Range Plan states: “ An excellent education includes a diversity of experiences
and perspectives throughout and beyond the curriculum. Broadening our community
will allow our students the opportunity to learn, to live, and to interact with
diverse groups both within and without the classroom.” The
proposed World Citizenship Plan seeks to address this goal by increasing
student contact with other communities, both within the gates of the college
and in the community at large. [k2]
The
Hampden-Sydney 2004-05 Intercultural “White” Focus Group Report found that many
of our students fail to take advantage of the programs offered that would
enhance their understanding of other cultures and that many fail to understand
why such an understanding would be important in the world of the 21st
century. These findings are not in
keeping with the general educational goals of the College of preparing our men
to “be active and informed participants in the life of their communities.” This plan addresses integrating such programs
into a community where some members are uncomfortable with differences and have
come to the College to seek a homogeneous environment. It defines World
Citizenship in broad terms and realizes that even within the dominant culture
of the College there is much diversity to be recognized and valued.
Part 1. Focus of the Plan
1) Has the institution provided a clear and
concise description of the critical issues(s) to be addressed?
The
core issue is the gap that exists between our goal of creating students who are
prepared to be leaders in a world culture and the lack of opportunities (and
desire for those opportunities) that exist for our students to interact with
people whose backgrounds are different from their own. In a college that is
overwhelmingly homogeneous, we believe this discrepancy needs to be addressed.
The challenge will be to do so in a way that is meaningful to our students and
in a way that they see as relevant for helping them navigate in the world that
exists beyond the college gates.[k3]
3) Has
the institution provided relevant and appropriate goals and objectives to
improve student learning?
What follows is a six-fold plan with goals,
objectives and benefits that we believe will offer students increased
opportunities to expand
their understanding of different cultures. It is our objective to create an
environment that is more conducive to productive interactions.
Items
I—III focus primarily on exposure to international cultures. Items IV-VI focus
primarily on exposure to American minorities.
(It is possible for this QEP to focus on either or both of these areas.)
I.
Sponsor Amity scholars to be part of the Hampden-Sydney community
“Amity
scholars are native speakers, between the ages of 20-30, who volunteer to work
in the
“The benefits of having Amity Scholars for the Modern Languages Program and for the College community are enormous. Amity Scholars interact with members of the college community in various capacities: as teacher aides in the Modern Languages, by becoming fellow classmates in courses in other departments and by participating in extracurricular
activities. They help educate our students about the culture of their native countries in formal, structured presentations, as well as through casual conversation and new friendships with members of the college community. They create and stimulate interest in international affairs, foreign languages and opportunities for study abroad. Their presence makes foreign languages a tangible reality and not just some vague subject from a textbook. Amity scholars are an inexpensive way to bring the far away parts of the world to Hampden-Sydney and help our students open their minds to the possibilities beyond our borders.” (Modern Language Report)
II.
Establish Language Houses as a way of promoting the language and culture of
other countries
“There is no doubt that language houses successfully promote and encourage the study of foreign languages. They are a space for students of a shared academic interest to gather, to practice that academic interest (the speaking of a foreign language) and to find means of promoting the language and culture to the entire campus community by hosting activities, meals, presentations, etc. Language houses can provide a place for language club meetings, for tutoring sessions for the language students who are fulfilling their graduation requirement, and for a reading room.” (Modern Language Report)
Amity scholars
could live in the language houses, providing a native speaker for the students
to model.[k5]
III
Provide students with greater opportunities for Study Abroad
Study abroad is an excellent way for
students to be exposed directly to other cultures and ideas. The study abroad
experience takes advantage of the type of learning that comes from immersion[k6] in another culture. These experiences
need to be made available to students regardless of economic status. A poll of
departmental needs yielded requests from both the Classics and Honors
departments for travel opportunities that would enable students to interact
academically outside the classroom and for enhanced funding to support these
opportunities.
IV.
Increase the number of minority and foreign students on campus.
We need to work aggressively to achieve
this goal, one that is an important part of our long-range plan. This part of
the plan is particularly challenging since Hampden-Sydney often is not the
first choice for minority students given the current homogeneous climate. We
will address this goal by hiring minority student(s) to work as recruiting
officers and by recruiting in areas where we are likely to have more contact
with minority students. We will also hire an English as a Second Language
teacher to work with international students.
V Continually work to increase the number
of minority faculty and professional staff
members.
We plan to establish a “Grow Your Own”
Program. This program would offer
high achieving minority students scholarships for graduate school if they
return to work in a staff or faculty position at the College. Returning
students are obviously more aware of the challenges of being a minority student
at Hampden-Sydney. They could provide role models and mentoring relationships
for our current minority students. This in turn could help minority students
feel more comfortable as members of the college community.[k7]
VI Provide
students with a variety of school-supported opportunities for interacting with
differing
cultures and communities outside the college gates.
Fewer of our students indicate
that they plan to participate in practicums, field experiences, or internships
than do students from other liberal art colleges. We need to make a wider range of experiences
available to our students and, when necessary, fund these experiences for
students who do not have the financial resources to take advance of them. These
experiences should go beyond attending lectures or events and focus on active
involvement in a community or culture.[k8]
Public Service Internships
or Service Learning Classes offer students the opportunity to
participate with cultures unlike their own.
These opportunities could take the form of a school sponsored service
trip during spring break or a special project such as Habitat for Humanity.
Other examples of projects that have successfully introduced our students to
cultures unlike their own are the student research project that Professor
Vitale is leading at the Piedmont Regional Jail and the Communicating Common
Ground class that brought Professor Deal’s oral rhetoric class into the
classroom of the local elementary school to discuss diversity. Communicating Common Ground projects occur simultaneously across
the
Service-oriented
classes and/or projects could also involve the sciences with projects that
focus on environmental testing and evaluation[k9] .
This service
component is also supported by the College’s long range plan that states: “We
will support programs and other initiatives so that our students will learn
that the capacity to live a moral life and to provide leadership and service
are among the most important outcomes of higher education…Pedagogy extends
beyond the classroom to active engagement in co- curricular student life. Promoting a sense of community within our
rural academic village is essential if we are to succeed in our academic
mission…The College expects and supports student, faculty, and staff
participation in major service activities (e.g., construction of a Habitat
House) and will promote involvement in service activities beyond the gates of
the campus.”
4)
Has the institution provided a
comprehensive and clear analysis of the crucial importance of
the Plan for improving the learning
environment?
Our institution has defined the
issues addressed in this QEP as those of crucial importance. To answer this
question we will return to the Hampden-Sydney College Long Range Plan that
states: “An excellent education includes a diversity of experiences and
perspectives throughout and beyond the curriculum. Broadening our community
will allow our students the opportunity to learn, to live, and to interact with
diverse groups both within and without the classroom.”
Additionally, the Hampden Sydney College Intercultural Affairs Committee states: “It also reasons that to be a viable citizen of the world and to function as good men and good citizens, one must be exposed to diverse populations both inside and outside of the classroom.”
5)
Has the institution identified the benefits to be derived from the QEP?
The
World Citizen QEP is a six-fold plan, with each part benefiting the educational
and/or institutional goals of the college. The educational benefits of each
aspect of the plan are listed as part of the description of the goals and objectives in question
number three.
1.
Has the institution provided a time line
for implementing and completing the QEP?
The six items listed in the above QEP plan of action could be implemented in the first year of the plan[k10] . Expanding student understanding of different cultures will not happen immediately. We are describing an organic process and not one that can be required of any student. It is our expectation that a student who spends four years on a campus with significantly increased opportunities for interaction with differing cultures will have exposure and interactions on a more frequent basis than they currently experience.
2.
Has the institution assigned qualified
individuals to administer and oversee its improvement
We plan to hire a second International
Studies Coordinator in order to expedite the study abroad component of this
plan[k11] . Additionally, we will hire an English as a Second Language teacher to
help our foreign students make the transition to a new language. Systems are
already in place to administer the Language Houses and the Amity scholars. The
school already offers courses with projects that are part of the Communicating
Common Ground
Program. The Assistant Dean of Students in conjunction with
the Academic Dean could oversee expanded opportunities for service learning.
The Provost would oversee the Grow Your Own program. The Dean of Admissions would seek to expand minority
recruitment.
3.
Has the institution provided evidence of
sufficient financial and physical resources to implement, sustain, and complete
the QEP?
What follows is a list of financial and
physical resource requirements to fulfill the goals of the QEP.
The Amity scholar costs are approximately
$3500 per academic year, per scholar, plus housing and board at approximately
$6000 per semester[k12] .
An International Studies Coordinator
would require a yearly salary
of $35,000, plus 25% benefits ($8750)
and a one-time cost of $4000 to conduct a search. We would also need to budget administrative/office
costs of $2500 for professional travel plus additional supplies, though this
person presumably would be under the umbrella of the Office of International
Studies, which already has a budget covering much of this work[k13] .
The English as a Second Language teacher
would command a salary of approximately $38,000, plus 25% benefits ($9500) and
a one-time cost of $4000 to conduct a search. Additionally, we would need to
budget approximately $2500 for travel and sundry expenses.[k14]
The Grow Your Own scholarship
program would need approximately $50,000 [k15] to
support one person per year.
Additionally, our long range plan states:
“By 2008, the College will have an endowment of at least $2 million to
underwrite the expenses for students to engage in internships related to their
studies, and another endowment of at least $2 million to underwrite study
abroad and other educational experiences beyond the campus that widen their
perspectives.”
4.
Has the institution identified relevant
internal and external measures to evaluate the Plan?
Externally, we will
use data from NSSE to monitor our student’s interaction with those whose
religious beliefs, political opinions, economic, social, racial, or ethnic
backgrounds or personal values vary from their own. Internally, we will continue to use Focus
Groups of the Intercultural Affairs Committee to monitor this program.[k16]
5.
Has the
institution identified an internal system for evaluating the QEP and monitoring
its progress?
No,
we have not[k17] ,
but could assign this chore to the Assessment Committee along with help from
the Dean’s Office and Institutional Research.
6.
Has the institution described how the
results of the evaluation of the QEP will be used to improve student learning?
If
successful, the programs outlined in the QEP will lead to our students having a
greater awareness and appreciation for different cultures that exist within the
1. Has the institution described the methods used
for the development of the QEP?
In response to this criterion we will
merely describe how we went about formulating the plan.
2.
Has the institution demonstrated that all
aspects of its community—faculty, staff, students, board members, and
administrators—were involved in the development of the QEP?
We
believe that we have sufficient faculty members on the planning committee, and
plan to open the discussion to all faculty members. We currently have three administrators on the
committee. We will have trustee participation when we present this topic to the
board at several Board of Trustee meetings.
Additionally, we will seek input from the student members of the Student
Affairs Committee and other student leaders.
|
PRO |
CON |
|
Provide our students with opportunities
to expand their understanding of different cultures. |
An
International Studies Coordinator would require a yearly salary
of $35,000, plus 25% benefits ($8750)
and a one-time cost of $4000 to conduct a search. We would also need to budget
administrative/office costs of $2500 for professional travel plus additional
supplies, though this person presumably would be under the umbrella of the
Office of International Studies, which already has a budget covering much of
this work. [$1,000,000 Endowment
Cost] |
|
The proposed World Citizenship Plan seeks to address this goal
by increasing student contact with other communities, both within the gates
of the college and in the community at large. |
The
English as a Second Language teacher would command a salary of approximately
$38,000, plus 25% benefits ($9500) and a one-time cost of $4000 to conduct a
search. Additionally, we would need to budget approximately $2500 for travel
and sundry expenses. [$1,000,000 Endowment Cost] |
|
The core issue
is the gap that exists
between our goal of creating students who are prepared to be leaders in a
world culture and the lack of opportunities (and desire for those
opportunities) that exist for our students to interact with people whose
backgrounds are different from their own. In a college that is overwhelmingly
homogeneous, we believe this discrepancy needs to be addressed. The challenge
will be to close the gap in
a way that is meaningful to our students and in a way that they see as
relevant for helping them navigate in the world that exists beyond the
college gates. |
The
Grow Your Own scholarship program would need approximately $50,000 to
support one person per year. [$1,000,000 Endowment Cost] [The
three items above are all PRO items, but carry significant endowment
fundraising price tags. The QEPC must
rank them, in terms of importance, since not all will likely be funded. In this sense, they carry CON
connotations.] |
|
We propose the employment of four Amity Interns per year: two in Spanish and one each
in French and German |
Has the institution identified an
internal system for evaluating the QEP and monitoring its progress?[Answer: NO] |
|
Amity scholars could live in the language houses, providing a native speaker
for the students to model ($3,500 & $6,000/year) |
|
|
We plan to
establish a “Grow Your Own”
Program |
|
|
Provide students with a variety of school supported opportunities for interacting with differing cultures and communities outside the college
gates |
|
|
Service-oriented
classes and/or projects
could also involve the sciences with projects that focus on environmental
testing and evaluation. |
|
|
six items listed in the above QEP plan of action could
be implemented in the first year |
|
|
Externally, we will use data from NSSE to monitor our
student’s interaction with those whose religious beliefs, political opinions,
economic, social, racial, or ethnic backgrounds or personal values vary from
their own. Internally, we will
continue to use Focus Groups of the Intercultural Affairs Committee to monitor
this program. |
|
[k1]This is an obvious “PRO.” Acquisition of cultural knowledge, both the student’s own, and that of other cultures is an excellent goal of liberal education. The College’s Western Culture requirement openly addresses the issue of expanding the typical student’s understanding of his own culture in this homogeneous setting.
[k2]Again, this is a PRO. The plan ties in with the College’s Long-range plan.
[k3]PRO. Yes, although I am not sure what “overwhelming” homogeneity is. We believe this discrepancy needs to be addressed.
[k4]This is, I believe, a cost-effective “PRO” for the QEP.
[k5]PRO: this is, I believe, one of the strongest elements of the international components of the world citizen plan.
[k6]immersion? Do we mean dunking into the water, or pulling out of the water? [Either way, beefing up the study abroad experience is a worthy goal.]
[k7]PRO: this is worth trying. We have heard doubt expressed as to whether or not such a program would succeed over the long-term. However, the merits of such a program, in terms of the stated modeling and mentoring relationships provided to minority students, make the program a worthy challenge for the College.
[k8]Big
PRO: this could dramatically change the face of
[k9]Pursuant to comment 8 above, I think this is also a big PRO.
[k10]Big PRO.
[k11]This is very important.
[k12]The comparative low-cost of this program makes it a winner. Big PRO.
[k13]This is tougher, albeit very important. The fund-raising component for this, in terms of endowment, are approximately $1,000,000. This doesn’t necessarily make this element of the program a “CON,” but it certainly places it in contention for scarce dollars with other elements of the QEP.
[k14]Again, this element carries a one-million-dollar endowment price tag. Although not automatically a CON—in fact, it is, on its face, a good thing—it, like the coordinator position, must compete with other QEP positions for scarce endowment funding. [maybe a quasi-CON]
[k15]This is a $1,000,000 endowment item. PRO: it is, I believe, one of the more worthy items the QEPC has identified. CON: the QEPC must seek to rank the million-dollar items in order of desirability, since not all will be funded in the course of the QEP project. [Perhaps this is a project for the meeting on the 16th?]
[k16]This is a PRO.
[k17]CON
[k18]A clear, resounding PRO